反自然主義
Anti-Japanese naturalism

だが反自然主義といっても、鴎外、漱石、荷風らの文学がそれぞれ異なっていたごとく、彼らのめざした方向も耽美主義、浪漫主義、理想主義、古典主義、理知主義等々、多様です。
However, even if anti-naturalism is said, it seems that Ogai, Soseki, Kafus' literature were respectively different, and the aestheticism, the romanticism, the idealism, the classicism, the intellect principle vary in the direction as well which they aimed at.

ただ日本の自然主義文学がやぼったく、くそまじめで、おもしろさ、たのしさのないこと、人生に対して悲観的で明るさがないこと、現実を描写することにとどまってそれ以上の想像力や理想や目的のないこと、事実や体験のみを尊重し虚構を排除していること、文学ことに西洋文学に対する独善的な誤った理解などに対しての反発と批判の心情は共通していました。

Japanese naturalism literature is only unfashionable,too Serious,That there are not amusement, happiness,That it doesn't have brightness pessimistically to the life, Reality, it is only content to describe it,That there are not imagination any further and an ideal and a purpose,To exclude fiction because only a fact and an experience are respected,The self-righteous wrong understanding that literature faces the West literature specially.
They shared their feeling of the repulsion toward these and the criticism.


奥野健男
Okuno,Takeo




powerd by


Home

LAST_MODIFIED Monday, 21-Aug-2000 05:34:44 EDT